Saturday, July 11, 2026

DMW to file motion for reconsideration as Ombudsman indicts ex-OWWA Chief for usurpation of official functions

The Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) announced that the Office of the Ombudsman has indicted former Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) Administrator Arnaldo A. “Arnell” Ignacio for Usurpation of Official Functions (Article 177 of the Revised Penal Code) relative to a ₱1.4-billion property acquisition.

DMW Secretary Hans Leo J. Cacdac confirmed during a press briefing at the DMW Central Office that the department received the Ombudsman Resolution on July 7, 2026. The resolution, dated June 19, 2026, concluded that Ignacio signed critical transaction documents—including the contract to sell, deed of absolute sale, and its addendum—and approved the disbursement of public funds without the necessary authority from the OWWA Board of Trustees.

According to the Ombudsman, Ignacio acted under the pretense of official authority despite knowing he lacked board approval. The resolution emphasized that the omission transcended “mere administrative non-compliance” and directly constituted a criminal offense. Usurpation of official functions carries a potential penalty of six months to four years of imprisonment.

The Ombudsman has directed that an Information be formally filed against Ignacio before the proper court.

While the Ombudsman moved forward with criminal charges for usurpation, it dismissed the accompanying complaints for alleged violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, malversation of public funds, and plunder against former OWWA officials and the private sellers.

Secretary Cacdac announced that the DMW will aggressively pursue a Motion for Reconsideration (MR) to urge a review of overlooked evidence, establishing two core components of graft:

1. Undue advantage given to the seller

The DMW revealed glaring irregularities in the timeline and execution of the transaction:

  • Premature Payouts: Two Land Bank checks totaling approximately ₱1.4 billion were issued to the seller on August 30, 2024—twelve days before the Deed of Absolute Sale was even executed on September 12, 2024.

  • Advance Receipt: A receipt shows the seller acknowledged receiving the full payment on September 11, 2024, a day prior to the signing.

  • Undue Haste: The transaction bypassed the institutional scrutiny, transparency, and oversight of the OWWA Board of Trustees to fast-track the sale.

2. Damage and prejudicial injury to the government

The DMW highlighted a severe discrepancy involving 51 condominium units valued at approximately ₱97 million that were factored into the ₱1.4-billion purchase price.

  • Although titles were issued under the name of the Republic of the Philippines (through OWWA), a recent ocular inspection by the current OWWA administration revealed that the condominium structures no longer exist.

  • Photographs from the site show a completely cleared plot of land with a backhoe, indicating unauthorized demolition.

  • The missing structures have contributed to an estimated property overpricing totaling ₱198 million. “The government paid for condominium units that no longer exist. That is the damage. That is the prejudicial aspect of this anomalous transaction,” Secretary Cacdac stressed. “Bakit giniba? Bakit nawala? Bakit binayaran na biglang nawala?”

The DMW noted that the missing condominium units were originally intended to serve as a halfway house for Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). Secretary Cacdac clarified that the legal push is a matter of state duty, particularly since the Commission on Audit (COA) will inevitably demand accountability for the 51 vanished property titles.

“This is nothing personal to any of the parties. We are duty-bound to file this Motion for Reconsideration,” Secretary Cacdac stated. “The Department is duty-bound to exhaust all available legal remedies to protect public funds, uphold accountability in the use of government resources, and safeguard the welfare funds of our overseas Filipino workers.”

The DMW reaffirmed its utmost respect for the constitutional mandate of the Office of the Ombudsman and assured full compliance with its ultimate, final determinations.

- Advertisement -spot_img
spot_img

LATEST

- Advertisement -spot_img